High-speed rail? Yes, please – Musings on the 10:15 from Birmingham Moor Street to London Marylebone

The railway infrastructure of the United Kingdom is atrocious. Yes, I did just say what politicians should have said years ago. Something needs to be done and FAST. We used to have the best railways in the world; now, even debt-ridden nations such as Spain have better services than us. Why? Because they have domestic high-speed rail services and we, the nation that once had railway services that were the envy of the world, are now laughed at by other developed economies due to our lack of domestic high-speed rail services.

High-speed rail should have been done years ago, shouldn’t it? But it wasn’t, because of the inefficiency of the nationalised railways and then the relentless rush to make a profit by the privatised franchises. The Chiltern Railways service that I am currently travelling on is one of few remaining examples of reasonably-priced, efficient services. I travel frequently on services that are ridiculously over-priced, unclean, and inefficient (London Midland services are frequently understaffed and late, with broken toilets on their Birmingham to Liverpool route).

One of the most important reasons why we need high-speed rail in the UK is to bring our railways up to speed with other members of the European Union; Sweden, Spain, and France amongst others all have high-quality, high-speed, and efficient services. Whereas it takes 8 or 9 hours to travel between Malaga and Madrid by car, the AVE service takes just three hours; I have personal experience of this and the way that passengers are treated on this service is just phenomenal (even better than travelling First Class on the West Coast mainline; the prices are comparable).

High speed rail in the UK would provide a major boost to a British economy, especially as it would really add business potential to thriving cities in the North and Midlands, such as Liverpool, Nottingham, Manchester, and Birmingham, through increased connectivity to London and the South East, the parts of the country that are currently most prosperous. It would create a stronger economy, through the creation of jobs in construction and in the cities that would benefit, and a fairer society, as it would help remedy the existing North-South divide by encouraging the creation of jobs and businesses in lesser economically developed regions and areas.

On to the problem: a few middle-class people in prosperous areas are worried about the effect that high-speed rail will have on the landscape of these prosperous regions. The environmental impact of having high-speed rail in the UK will surely outweigh the fears that these people have, as these services will take people out of their cars and limit the number of flights for airports in the North to London and vice-versa.

The time for action by the government and the rail franchises is now, not in 20 or 30 years time! High-speed rail may not solve all of the problems that we need to tackle to become an ‘aspiration nation’ (better education and other reforms can do that) but it certainly can play a part in creating a stronger economy and fairer society where everyone can get on in life if it is enacted soon. Bring us up to speed with the rest of Western Europe, please Mr Clegg.

Let’s make high-speed rail something that is a symbol of a stronger economy and a fairer society, where everyone can get on in life. Focus on what unites us, rather than what divides us.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “High-speed rail? Yes, please – Musings on the 10:15 from Birmingham Moor Street to London Marylebone

  1. Ellis Palmer has simply regurgitated discredited claims: 1. “One of the most important reasons”: Oh dear! No, we don’t “need to bring our railways up to speed” – why because we already have a nationwide network of high speed trains, perfectly adequate for our tiny Island: it’s the existing infrastructure that needs upgrading. 2. HS rail will boost the economy – No, many, many extremely well-respected economists have already disputed this. 3. A National Park (The Chilterns AONB) will be destroyed – everyone who values visiting beautiful places anywhere should be fighting to stop this – or does the author think it would be ok to destroy the Lake District or the Yorkshire Moors, etc., etc. 4. HS2 is NOT green and is arguably not even carbon neutral and how will it get people out of cars between London and B’ham when there are no stations – all 8 million of them? 5. HS2 isn’t need for capacity: The DfT had to release figures in Dec 2012 which showed that the WCML was only 52% full at peak times.
    6. The last transport study was produced in 2006 (Sir Rod Eddington) for the then Labour Govt.: It specifically recommended investing and upgrading existing infrastructure and warned against falling for high speed rail: google it and read if you want to understand how well the lobbyists have buried reasoned argument. For facts, not opinions such as Mr Palmer’s, look at HS2 Action Alliance.

  2. Agree totally Ellis.
    A single train line doesn’t destroy the countryside, it often enhances it!
    Our train system is good and underestimated but years behind the rest of europe.
    I supect the detractors live in the countryside but have a nave Land Rover to commute about?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s